Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Mono Black Demons | kazutaka oya | 11-3 | None |
Rakdos Aggro | fabfoe | 9-5 | None |
Mono Black Demons | strongmind | 6-2 | None |
Dimir Bounce | klemen pirc | 6-2 | None |
Mono Black Demons | giordano distefano | 7-7 | None |
Esper Pixie | kazunarin | 7-5 | None |
Esper Pixie | dr4gun0v | 6-8 | None |
Abzan Pixie , Abzan Roots , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Oculus , Dimir Reanimator , Domain Zur Overlords , Esper Pixie , Golgari Midrange
Inquisition of Kozilek ranks #459 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 9%).
Black average: 49.9%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Inquisition of Kozilek is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Performance Efficiency: 17.04 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. Inquisition of Kozilek has a win rate of 56.5%, making it 19.2% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Emrakul, the Promised End | Legendary Creature — Eldrazi | 6 | 82.1% | 3 |
Bone Shards | Sorcery | 5 | 72.5% | 1 |
Exhume | Sorcery | 5 | 71.1% | 2 |
Wurmcoil Engine | Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Wurm | 5 | 69.6% | 2 |
Dark Petition | Sorcery | 7 | 69.1% | 3 |
Liliana, Dreadhorde General | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 6 | 68.8% | 1 |
Liliana, the Last Hope | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 5 | 68.6% | 1 |
Walking Ballista | Artifact Creature — Construct | 6 | 68.1% | 3 |
Buried Alive | Sorcery | 6 | 63.4% | 2 |
Black Market Connections | Enchantment | 7 | 62.5% | 0 |
Cards that perform better with Inquisition of Kozilek than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emrakul, the Promised End | Legendary Creature — Eldrazi | 13 | 5 | 91.3% | 61.6% | +29.7% |
Gitaxian Probe | Sorcery | 1 | 7 | 81.8% | 57.5% | +24.4% |
Expedition Map | Artifact | 1 | 6 | 77.8% | 55.6% | +22.2% |
Walking Ballista | Artifact Creature — Construct | 0 | 6 | 75.8% | 56.6% | +19.1% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 12 | 73.3% | 54.5% | +18.8% |
Liliana, the Last Hope | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 5 | 74.1% | 58.1% | +16.0% |
Bitter Triumph | Instant | 2 | 6 | 72.2% | 56.4% | +15.8% |
Feed the Swarm | Sorcery | 2 | 9 | 72.3% | 58.2% | +14.1% |
Chrome Mox | Artifact | 0 | 5 | 68.4% | 54.7% | +13.7% |
Reanimate | Sorcery | 1 | 11 | 69.2% | 56.2% | +13.0% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Mono Black Demons | 19 | 9.9% | 57.2% |
Esper Pixie | 12 | 0.6% | 41.3% |
Orzhov Pixie | 11 | 4.4% | 41.1% |
Gruul Leyline | 11 | 4.5% | 30.9% |
Dimir Midrange | 9 | 0.4% | 41.1% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.